Everything you ever wanted to know about sex

Of all the phantasmagoric strains to rise from the increasingly hysterical gyrations of our “free media”, the most vacuous has been that creed known as “transgenderism”. This creed has relentlessly cloaked itself in the most ferociously applied moral proclamations, utilising the rhetoric of the civil rights movement to proselytize for a demographic that makes no sense whatsoever.

In order to substantiate this nebulous nullity, we have an entire array of neologisms: “cis” with its derivatives (“cissexism” / “cisnormativity”), “deadnaming”, “aromatnic”, “biphobia”, “pansexual” etc.

Attempting to lead an excursion through this ever expanding febrile underbrush is very demanding since it involves exhuming old definitions which, in the rapidly revisionising realm we have entered, are themselves becoming distant and misty. This furious refashioning of language is a concomitant of capitalism which must have its “ever new” to flog the latest pile of crap or, more precisely, to repackage the old crap. So let’s start by talking about some basics.

Despite the constant dribbling over all manner of “novel” sexual matters – and the feverishly alternating positions and configurations of pornography – there’s really not much to say about sex if considered from a purely physical point of view. There’s straight sex and there’s gay sex. And bisexuality is an alteration of those.

Furthermore, at this point, and with all the very real advances made by real civil rights groups, nobody cares what consenting adults do in private. And that was bad news for capitalism which feeds off dissatisfaction, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation etc. Hence it wasn’t enough to have folks merely accepting that some adults liked to fornicate with the same sex etc. Oh no, we had to have “gay culture” and the “gay lifestyle” etc. All arbitrarily arranged around certain cultural products which thereby became easier to sell. Capitalism does love a spectacle.

Another problem is that when folks start to have the effrontery to actually accept each other, then there is the danger of forging solidarity. So if some huckster can dream up another non-sequitur connection, then the ruling class are happy twice over: profits increase and the public remain divided. The more demographics the better.

So, in short, the sex-community-divide scam was running out of steam. So ... The Mighty Prophet of Capital said “Let there be Transgenderism!”. And lo! etc.

So what’s that all about?

This is where we try and rummage through some very weird and mercurial matter which will shape and re-shape itself, where every aspect screams insanity and seems to lead on to every other aspect. And there is no coherence to any of it whatsoever.

So hold on tight!

Our fine four gendered friend

“Gender” is a real word. It’s been used for ages. It’s been in use all my life. There was never any problem with it. It always meant: either male or female.

Now it doesn’t. It has been through some kind of word grinder.

Concerning the new concept of “gender”, there is a handy webpage. It did occur to me that the page in question may be a parody. But who can tell? Such is the nature of the post-covid world. Indeed, such is the nature of the world that came to be defined as “postmodern”. Anyway – here it is:

https://www.medicinenet.com/what_are_the_72_other_genders/article.htm

There would seem to be 72 genders – or 74 if you are reactionary enough to still consider male and female as genders. This site helpfully provides a listing of the genders with definitions. Or so you might think ... until you actually read it.

There are four classes of definition. There are circular definitions like these:

Agender: A person who does not identify themselves with or experience any gender. Agender people are also called null-gender, genderless, gendervoid, or neutral gender.

.....

Alexigender: The person has a fluid gender identity between more than one type of gender although they cannot name the genders they feel fluid in.

.....

Ambigender: Having two specific gender identities simultaneously without any fluidity or fluctuations.

You will note that each of these defines a specific gender with reference to other genders ... which remain undefined.

There are definitions that hover around the presumably now defunct concept of male and female:

Aliusgender: This gender identity stands apart from existing social gender constructs. It means having a strong specific gender identity that is neither male nor female.

....

Ambonec: The person identifies themselves as both man and woman and yet does not belong to either.

Well at least the other genders referred to are meaningful i.e. male or female. But the “new gender” remains nebulous, poised somewhere between or around or outside the old two.

Then you have “genders” that are just appropriations from elsewhere:

Anxiegender: This gender identity has anxiety as its prominent characteristic.

So basically anxiety redefined as “gender”. So “gender” is a new term for ... mood?

And then there are those that are just downright bizarre:

Astergender: The person has a bright and celestial gender identity.

Astral gender: Having a gender identity that feels to be related to space.

Autigender: Having a gender identity that feels to be closely related to being autistic.

And you’ll note that all of the above come under “A”. I don’t have the patience to go further through this barrage of bull where it becomes ever clearer that whoever wrote this is making it up as they go along.

In any case, the upshot of all this tomfoolery is that, if “gender” doesn’t relate to sexuality, then it is hopelessly unclear what it does relate to. And if it can mean anything then it means nothing. It has effectively been removed from the English language in Orwellian fashion. It is now a noise that gets people riled.

Either/Or

And then there is that new term “non-binary”. If we take this at face value, it means neither male nor female. Thus if we mean to be consistent, we should not refer to “men”, “women”, “male”, “female” or any other term suggesting binary.

But in this brave new trans world we find constant reference to “transmen” and “transwomen”. Not to mention “transition” which implies changing from one side to another.

So we’re back to binary.

Your assignment should you choose to accept it

We also have the astonishing news that people are “assigned” as male or as female at birth.

“Assigned”? You are assigned homework. You are assigned a job. You are assigned to a duty. But assigned “male or female”?

The point is that to be assigned anything at all you have to be already there. And what you are assigned is, by definition, temporary. Under the transgender theology, gender (as in sexuality) is something assigned. Therefore our “innermost essence” (“spiritual form”?) has indeterminate sexuality. ...

And yet ... that can’t quite be true. If we were “indeterminate” then we could indeed assume any sexuality we wanted. And it is clear from the fulminations of the Trans lot that we have a definite state which “nature can get wrong”. So e.g. you can be born with all the physical attributes of a man ... and yet “be” a “woman”. Your “femininity” is somehow hovering somewhere in your pre-birth astral state ... or something.

And as is so often the case in this strange new world, we are flailing around as the very language we use liquefies.

Won’t someone think of the children?

And then there’s perhaps the most troubling aspect of this “revolution in sexuality”: talk of “trans kids”.

Children are by definition pre-pubescent. Their bodies have not matured hence their lives as active sexual beings has not begun. Nor should it begin until their bodies and minds are ready for it. Why is anyone encouraging children to think about their sexuality?

The terms they are a changin’

Now I have already mentioned “cis” as in “cisgender”. This refers to those who “identify with the gender they were assigned at birth”. This means that we have taken a nice little somersault by which we no longer see the old sexual binary as primary and that other forms of sexuality derive therefrom. Oh no! Now everyone starts out in a kind of gender freeform state and is then ... yes, you guessed it, assigned.

So now the entire male/female duality is secondary. Transgenderism is “the norm”!

etc. etc. etc. etc.

We could go on and on. None of this stands up to the most rudimentary scrutiny.

And yet .......

I’ve seen the most furious flurries on social media over this. I’ve been violently denounced for making the queries I make above. How dare I ask these questions! After all “everyone knows” what “gender” means. But they don’t. And the really worrying thing is that not only do they not know what gender is, they don’t know that they don’t know!

Oh and transgressing against the transgender theology is the only thing I have ever received twitter warning messages about. Even raising the issues I have raised above counts as “hate speech”!

And all this ferocious vacuity is apparently driving screaming matches everywhere. But that’s not the worst bit. This bizarre new theology has had and continues to have devastating effects.

Back in the real world

One has already been mentioned: the kids. They are told that they might not be “the norm”. They might be “trans kids”. And if they are trans kids then they are deserving of special attention, special compassion, special treatment. They are to be accepted and protected from prejudice.

And the entire rhetoric around trans people always emphasises this matter of “safe spaces”. Which sounds decidedly familiar. It echoes “Stay safe!” – the mantra of the covid age.

So the kids are given this vision of being special. How could they resist? “Yes, I’ll sign up for that!”

And it would seem that some “signed up for that” even before they were born! A little google on the topic and that awfully nice AI generator tells me:

While it's not scientifically possible to "know" your gender in the womb, many people feel a strong sense of their gender identity early in life, sometimes even describing a feeling of "always knowing" they were a girl or boy, even before birth; however, this is a personal experience and not based on any biological evidence of conscious awareness in the womb.

“even before birth”! These are the days of miracle and wonder!

If our kids sign up for this magical mystery tour then they are given ... puberty blockers to – what else? – “keep them safe”. In this case, “safe” from the changes their body is about to go through as part of its natural development.

All of this initiating a pathway to “vital surgery” later on.

And now that we have broached that topic ....

You cannot transform a man into a woman or vice versa. If you try, you end up with a mutilated, i.e. neutered, person.

The new arrivals

And what of those who have “transitioned”? Well they look as good as anyone possibly can ... if they’ve been neutered. I’m seriously worried about Elliot Page.

Speaking of which, I’ve never seen such hysterical rhetoric as that which surrounds those who have made that “leap”. They have experienced such “joy”. Nay, never mind “joy”, it’s “euphoria”!

More than a woman

But perhaps not surprisingly, a lot of men who have decided they “are really women” have decided not to go through with the surgery. And why should they? There’s no need. After all, is it not the case that the new theology has separated body from ... some kind of inner essence? And is it not the case that this “inner essence” contains the true meaning of gender?

Therefore we can forget about genitalia. A “penis owner” can be “a woman”.

And so all of the realms reserved for women alone are now open to those special women ... who just happen to have penises.

It may be tempting to get a little bit jaded here and suggest that this is a perfect opportunity for male predators to invade women’s spaces. But such a suggestion would be “transphobic”.

The effects of these phantasmagoric fables have been well documented by various apostates. And in the spirit of laziness, and unwilling to reinvent the wheel, I’ll just direct you to Mr Graham Linehan who has been gathering a veritable encyclopaedia of the baleful effects of all this bollocks. Here is a mere sample:

A Week in the War on Women: Monday 27th January - Sunday 2nd February

But there is so much more.

Wikipedia has been compiling a practical telephone directory’s worth of the seemingly now ubiquitous trans population.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transgender_people

Note the header:

This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources.

Yes! Exciting opportunities in this exciting new ever expanding oxymoronic demographic!

Here’s one of the crew (who interestingly doesn’t appear on the list linked to above – but I guess that’s what happens when you have such a thriving new business!):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nava_Mau

You will notice that Nava Mau is referred to as an “actress” and has “she” and “her” pronouns throughout. A little further down we read that

Mau starred as Sofia, a young transgender woman who meets a potential romantic connection Isaac, a cisgender man, at a party.

So we might start to twig that all is not as it seems.

But it isn’t until we get near to the bottom of the entry, in the section entitled “Personal Life”, that we read,

Mau is a transgender woman and has played a transgender character in most productions she has worked on.

i.e. Mau was “assigned male at birth” i.e. Mau is a man. And a man whose original name is not revealed. Nor is it “meant to be” revealed. There is a prohibition against such an indiscretion. Indeed, such an offence is called “dead naming”.

Wiki tells us that

Deadnaming is the act of calling a transgender or non-binary person by their birth name after they have chosen a new name. Many transgender people change names as part of gender transition, and wish for their former name (deadname) to be kept private.

Well you have to respect their wishes – apparently. But I can foresee a few ... inconveniences arising here. Wiki – supposedly the forum for finding out, you know, knowledge – is now compiling an inventory of people without pasts!

To be sure, this particular line of waffle-de-doo-dah seems to be running dry. But it still has a way to go:

https://x.com/Sidewalk_Steve/status/1900723242148442294

Masked woman with sassy right-on fervour makes a bold stand! But isn’t it funny how the truth will always out. Pay attention to what she says at the two minute mark:

We have bigger problems than trans people. This is a made up problem.

Ain't that the truth!