Very brave of you. I agree, I think it's unnatural. A symptom. We live in a world where learning about nature and therefore perhaps an appreciation or even a relationship with the Divine has been completely inverted and desecrated. Transhumanism is certainly part of this.
Sorry it took so long to respond to your comment. It must have sneaked in when I wasn’t looking!
As I hope I made clear, what adults consent to in privacy is entirely their business.
But what is remarkable here is that, even considering the increasing openness about sexual matters – particularly sexual variations – it is downright weird to hear open references to anal. For I can recall the days when even the “raunchy” tales in the old top shelf material wouldn’t mention it and, when they did, they noted they had to hint at it for fear of being banned!
But now it’s everywhere. And the truly bizarre thing is that, if you object, you may very well be accused of “hate speech”! After all, you’d be implying that a “vulnerable” part of the community was “sick”! Which of course isn’t at all what you’re doing. What you’re doing is saying: “Carry on with your private life but remember it’s private!”
As I said in an earlier post:
Take for instance a complaint made by a mother back in the 70s that her very young daughter, who riskily allowed her eyes to wander upwards, asked why two semi-nude women were groping each other. Was the child less likely to ask the question if the titillating picture was placed much lower?
But then again, nothing illustrates the awesome gap between then and now more than the likelihood that even a mother worrying about her child’s exposure to porn would probably be accused of “homophobic hate speech” were she to complain about such an image. Not only was porn about to invade the lower spaces but the threadbare excuse of irony would even give way to a morally charged ban on protesting AGAINST it!
But then again, that was a case of lesbianism. Back then, as I noted, anal was the big taboo. Now it seems to have been “consecrated”. So much so that there was even talk at one time of referring to the vagina as a “bonus hole”! Thus, anal becomes the norm. And the vagina is an “added attraction”! Indeed, there is an implication that we are not supposed to mention the vagina since it would be an “attack on the trans community”!
And now I hear about young folk forming relationships which are threatened because the boy wants to try anal! And he even insists on it. Such is the corrupting nature of porn: it generates a totally false vision of actual sexual relationships.
Very brave of you. I agree, I think it's unnatural. A symptom. We live in a world where learning about nature and therefore perhaps an appreciation or even a relationship with the Divine has been completely inverted and desecrated. Transhumanism is certainly part of this.
Sorry it took so long to respond to your comment. It must have sneaked in when I wasn’t looking!
As I hope I made clear, what adults consent to in privacy is entirely their business.
But what is remarkable here is that, even considering the increasing openness about sexual matters – particularly sexual variations – it is downright weird to hear open references to anal. For I can recall the days when even the “raunchy” tales in the old top shelf material wouldn’t mention it and, when they did, they noted they had to hint at it for fear of being banned!
But now it’s everywhere. And the truly bizarre thing is that, if you object, you may very well be accused of “hate speech”! After all, you’d be implying that a “vulnerable” part of the community was “sick”! Which of course isn’t at all what you’re doing. What you’re doing is saying: “Carry on with your private life but remember it’s private!”
As I said in an earlier post:
Take for instance a complaint made by a mother back in the 70s that her very young daughter, who riskily allowed her eyes to wander upwards, asked why two semi-nude women were groping each other. Was the child less likely to ask the question if the titillating picture was placed much lower?
But then again, nothing illustrates the awesome gap between then and now more than the likelihood that even a mother worrying about her child’s exposure to porn would probably be accused of “homophobic hate speech” were she to complain about such an image. Not only was porn about to invade the lower spaces but the threadbare excuse of irony would even give way to a morally charged ban on protesting AGAINST it!
(https://georgemc189059.substack.com/p/just-a-bit-of-fun)
But then again, that was a case of lesbianism. Back then, as I noted, anal was the big taboo. Now it seems to have been “consecrated”. So much so that there was even talk at one time of referring to the vagina as a “bonus hole”! Thus, anal becomes the norm. And the vagina is an “added attraction”! Indeed, there is an implication that we are not supposed to mention the vagina since it would be an “attack on the trans community”!
And now I hear about young folk forming relationships which are threatened because the boy wants to try anal! And he even insists on it. Such is the corrupting nature of porn: it generates a totally false vision of actual sexual relationships.